Research/Learn/How much should you spend on GEO and AEO?
BUDGETING

How much should you spend on GEO and AEO?

The honest answer is a formula, not a number: what a recommended customer is worth in your business, times how much of your category's buying now flows through AI conversations, minus what you can capture free. Work through it in ten minutes and your budget defends itself in any room.

Daniel Arons, Co-founder and CEO of Aethon AI
Daniel Arons · Co-founder & CEO, Aethon AI
Eight years building digital marketing programs across SaaS, financial services, and consumer brands · Updated July 2026

The formula, worked through

Start with customer value: average gross margin per new customer, times the customers a single strong AI recommendation moment could plausibly influence monthly in your category. Then estimate exposure: run ten real buyer questions through the four assistants and count how many produce brand recommendations at all, that percentage is how far the shortlist era has reached your category, and the free plus an hour gives you the number. A B2B firm with $20,000 customers in a category where seven of ten questions already name vendors has a very different justified budget than a local shop where two of ten do. Multiply honestly and most businesses land in one of three tiers below, and the exercise itself, documented, is the business case your CFO actually wants.

The three spend tiers, and who belongs in each

Tier zero, $0 plus founder or marketer hours: right for businesses whose category shows low AI recommendation exposure today, or pre-revenue startups. Run the free baseline and the manual loop from how to start doing AEO and GEO, and re-check exposure quarterly, because it only moves one direction. Tier one, $200 to $800 monthly, platform pricing: right for the broad middle, real category exposure, no spare execution capacity, where software running the loop beats every alternative on cost per moment won; this is where Aethon's published tiers sit, deliberately. Tier two, four to five figures monthly, platform plus agency judgment or dedicated headcount: right only when AI recommendations demonstrably drive contested, high-value categories, and only with the ninety-day evaluation gates from the services guide. The most common budgeting mistake is not overspending or underspending, it is spending tier-two money on tier-one problems because a vendor quoted first and the math never happened.

When to raise, hold, or cut the budget

Revisit quarterly against three signals. Raise when share of tracked moments is climbing and each point of share shows up in branded arrivals and tagged pipeline, per AI traffic analytics, that is a machine converting budget into revenue, and marginal dollars keep earning until share plateaus. Hold when share is climbing but the revenue chain has not confirmed yet, normal in long sales cycles; give it the cycle length before judging. Cut, or re-tier, when two quarters show no share movement despite shipped fixes: something upstream is wrong, usually basket design or category exposure, and more spend amplifies a broken loop. The scoreboard that makes these calls unambiguous is in how to know if your GEO is working, and it is the same one we put in front of our own customers.

Two budget scenarios, worked

Scenario one, a $30,000-deal B2B firm: exposure test shows six of ten buying questions already name vendors, and one strong recommendation moment could plausibly influence two deals a month. Even at conservative attribution, that is meaningful five-figure monthly upside, which comfortably justifies tier-one platform spend and, if the category is contested, tier-two with an execution partner. The budget here is capped by capacity to ship fixes, not by willingness to pay. Scenario two, a local service business with $2,000 jobs: exposure test shows only two of ten questions name anyone, so the shelf is barely forming. The right spend is tier zero, free baseline plus the monthly hour, with a calendar reminder to re-test exposure next quarter, because the moment it climbs, the math flips to tier one. The lesson both scenarios share: the number falls out of customer value times exposure, and running that two-variable calculation honestly prevents both the overspend of buying ahead of exposure and the underspend of ignoring a shelf that is already full.

What if my exposure is medium, not clearly high or low?

Start tier zero to one and let the trend decide: if quarterly exposure keeps climbing and early fixes move share, step up. Medium-and-rising is the classic case for a cheap platform now rather than an agency later.

Does the budget change as AI adoption grows?

Yes, one direction: exposure only rises, so the justified budget rises with it. Re-running the exposure test quarterly keeps your spend matched to a moving target instead of a stale assumption.

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of marketing budget should GEO and AEO get?

Percent-of-budget rules mislead here because exposure varies so much by category. Run the exposure test and price the tier it indicates; for most mid-market teams that lands at a low single-digit percent of marketing spend, replacing softer line items.

Is free really viable or is that marketing?

Genuinely viable for low-exposure categories and early stages: baseline, direct answers, schema, and consistency cost hours, not dollars. The free tier exists because selling tier-one software to tier-zero problems creates churn, not customers.

Should GEO budget come from SEO or paid?

From wherever attribution is weakest. Most teams fund it by cutting the least-attributable slice of paid, which also makes the before-and-after comparison natural at renewal time.

How fast should spend show ROI?

Visibility movement inside a quarter, revenue confirmation inside one buying cycle after that. Budget decisions made faster than that timeline are decisions about patience, not performance.

Does agency spend count toward the same math?

Yes, and hold it to the same cost per moment won. The formula does not care whose invoice it is; it cares whether moments and revenue moved per dollar.

See where your brand stands in AI.

Book a 30-minute call and we run your top prompts through ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity, live.

The best AI tools for patient acquisition, by job to be done

Patient acquisition tools fall into three buckets. Intake and scheduling tools convert demand you already have. Ads and CRM tools buy and manage demand. The newest bucket creates demand you are currently invisible to: AI visibility platforms that make sure your practice is the one ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity recommend when a patient describes symptoms, coverage, and location in their own words. That conversation happens before any search, which is why practices that only invest in the first two buckets never see the patients they lost. Aethon covers this third bucket end to end: it maps the patient moments in your specialty, tracks which providers get recommended and why, and publishes the fixes. See how this plays out for virtual care in how AI helps patients find telehealth providers, or check your own visibility with the free .