Different scoreboard, different game
SEO optimizes for positions on a results page: rankings, clicks, traffic. GEO (generative engine optimization) optimizes for presence inside AI answers: whether assistants mention you, how they describe you, and whether you make the shortlist. There are no positions eleven through one hundred in an AI answer. There is named, or not.
What each agency actually does
An SEO agency ships keyword strategy, technical fixes, links, and ranking content. A GEO agency ships answer-ready content, structured data, corrected third-party sources, presence in the reviews and comparisons assistants cite, and continuous monitoring of what the assistants say. The deliverables overlap maybe a third. The measurement overlaps almost none.
Where the skills genuinely differ
GEO requires things SEO never demanded: tracking probabilistic answers across four assistants, diagnosing which citations carry a recommendation, writing content that models quote rather than pages that rank, and covering conversational buyer moments instead of keyword lists. Ask any agency how they measure AI answers and the difference reveals itself in one sentence.
When you need which
Still building basic organic presence? SEO first: GEO builds on an indexable, authoritative site. Solid rankings but absent from AI answers? That is a GEO gap, and it compounds while ignored. High-consideration categories where buyers research with AI (software, legal, financial, healthcare) should be running both now.
One partner or two
Foundations shared, last mile different. Some brands run an SEO agency and layer a GEO specialist on top. Aethon is built as the GEO layer: we track your presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity, then ship the fixes that change the answers, working alongside whatever SEO program you already run.